

City forward line shaping up as Santa Cruz, Tevez (it seems) come aboard
By: Thad | June 20th, 2009The cliche used to be that every player in the world wants to play for Manchester United. Well, I’m sure a lot of them do, but Carlos Tevez is not one of them.
The industrious Argentine’s departure for greener pastures–presumably pastures in which he will be valued as an automatic first team choice–has been officially confirmed. City are widely reported to be in the lead for Tevez’s signature.
A transfer fee has also been agreed at last to bring in Roque Santa Cruz from Blackburn. That deal should be confirmed early this week, pending a medical.

If and when both deals go through, City will have a pan-South American forward line, presumably consisting of Robinho on the left wing, RSC in the middle, and Tevez on the right. Craig Bellamy likely will have to settle for a place on the bench when all are fit.
The tricky, challenging part for Mark Hughes will be organizing the midfield behind the front three. One aggressive approach would be to play Gareth Barry as a holding midfielder with Stephen Ireland and SWP in more advanced positions; a more cautious approach might see Barry paired with De Jong as holding midfielders and Ireland going forward, leaving SWP on the bench or to compete for a forward role.
Personally I’d like to see City employ an attack-minded formation; having SWP and potentially Tevez on the same side of the field is an exciting prospect, and will make it more difficult to close Robinho out of the game on the other side. Anyway you slice it, however, Hughes is going to have to leave a quality player on the bench. The last City manager to accumulate this quantity of good players–Kevin Keegan, who went on what was then regarded a prodigious shopping spree prior to the 2003-04 season–was justly criticized for inconsistent and incoherent tactics and team selection that season. Hughes will need to do much, much better than that.
City fans will be delighted if Tevez comes aboard, but there are a few more doubts about Santa Cruz; some think City have overpaid a bit for a recently injured player whose career scoring record isn’t that impressive simply because he is a personal favourite of Hughes. We’ll find out soon enough whether Hughes likes RSC for good reason. Of course, RSC’s position as a first choice isn’t firmly confirmed either, with City still being linked with Samuel Eto’o.
For City to be the club that is “driving the transfer market” still takes some getting used to. It was just 2 1/2 years ago that City fans were delighted to have signed Emile Mpenza on a free transfer to bolster the forward line. (A shrewd move by Stuart Pearce, who’s doing his reputation no harm at the moment with the England under-21s.) Tevez signing for City, if it happens, would be not only a reminder that those days are long gone but a giant step forward in legitimating the club as a favoured destination for world class players.
| EPL Match Schedule | Discount Travel to Manchester | |||
| Manchester City Scores | City of Manchester Stadium information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



How many forwards do you have on the books, 20 or so?
Posted from
United States

-



I’m really interested in Daniel Sturridge. His contract is about to expire and apparently he and Man City couldn’t reach an agreement. Rumour was that he was heading to Chelsea, but I’d love to see him sign for (or loaned to) a Prem team where he’d get regular first team football.
Posted from
United States

-



just to be clear, rumours that Paul Dickov is still on the books are false. But Benjani and Vassell almost certainly are gone, and Bojinov might become available. Caicedo and Evans are almost certainly available but won’t be allowed to go for nothing.
At the moment I’d like to have Robinho, RSC, Tevez, Bellamy, Bojinov, and Caicdeo for next year. 6 forwards is not that many when you expect to play 3. You can’t turn away Eto’o however so if he comes, someone else will have to go to.
Sturridge story is a pity. He is an excellent talent, potentially a genuine star in the EPL and possibly for England–pace, skill on the ball, eye for goal. The issue with City is he wants wage parity with top line players who’ve done the business for some time already, and if City give in it will create all kinds of headaches. Sturridge did fine when he played last season but was injured too much to make a sustained impact–a shame because an opportunity was there.
Yes I’m sure the middle-tier clubs would love to take him but on those wage demands (believed to be about 80,000 pounds/week) it’s no surprise only Chelsea are seriously interested.
Posted from
United States

-



p.s. the above of course completely forget about Jo, on loan at Everton since January. I think the goals he scored for Everton have lifted his stock–many City fans seemed ready to put the “bad signing” label on him when he left.
I don’t think there can be room for both him and Caicedo. at least one will have to go, in all likelihood.
Posted from
United States

-



I’m a bit Tevez fan and he would do well, I have my reservations about RSC. I think he is a good player but injuries last season made it a poor season for him and I’m not sure if it is going to be an ongoing problem.
Posted from
United States

-



City is going to have a scary front line if Tevez puts pen to paper ..
Posted from
Canada

-



Конечно, спору нет.
Posted from
China

Comments are closed












